(독서) Daily Stoic 12월 1일 PRETEND TODAY IS THE END

"The person who follows reason in all things will have both leisure and a readiness to act-they are at once both cheerful and self- composed."-MARCUS AURELIUS, MEDITATIONS, 10.12b ("모든 일에서 이성을 따르는 사람은 여가와 행동의 준비성을 동시에 갖추게 되며, 그는 언제나 밝고 침착할 것입니다."  - 마르쿠스 아우렐리우스, 《명상록》 10.12b )   The guiding reason of the world-the Stoics called this the logos- works in mysterious ways. Sometimes, the logos gives us what we want, other times it gives us precisely what we do not want. In either case, they believed that the logos was an all-powerful force that governed the universe.   There is a helpful analogy to explain the logos: We are like a dog leashed to a moving cart. The direction of the cart will determine where we go. Depending on the length of the leash, we also have a fair amount of room to explore and determine the pace, but ultimately what each of us must choose is ...

"Don't lament this and don't get agitated." -MARCUS AURELIUS, MEDITATIONS, 7.43 ("이것에 대해 한탄하지 말고 흥분하지도 마십시오."-마르쿠스 아우렐리우스, 명상록 7.43)   There's that feeling we get when something happens: It's all over now. All is lost. What follows are complaints and pity and misery- the impotent struggle against something that's already occurred.   Why bother? We have no idea what the future holds. We have no idea what's coming up around the bend. It could be more problems, or this could be the darkness before the dawn.   If we're Stoic, there is one thing we can be sure of: whatever happens, we're going to be OK. 어떤 일이 발생했을 때 우리는 이런 느낌을 받습니다. "이제 다 끝났어. 모든 게 망가졌어." 그 뒤로 이어지는 것은 불평과 연민, 그리고 이미 일어난 일에 대한 무력한 몸부림입니다. 왜 애써야 하겠습니까? 우리는 미래가 어떻게 될지 전혀 알지 못합니다. 어떤 ...

"If someone is slipping up, kindly correct them and point out what they missed. But if you can't, blame yourself-or no one." -MARCUS AURELIUS, MEDITATIONS, 10.4 ("누군가가 실수를 하고 있다면, 친절하게 바로잡아 주고 그들이 놓친 점을 알려주십시오. 하지만 그럴 수 없다면, 자신을 탓하거나 아무도 탓하지 마십시오."  - 마르쿠스 아우렐리우스, 『명상록』 10.4  )   A good teacher knows that when a student is failing, the blame falls on the instructor, not the pupil. How much more generous and tolerant would we be if we could extend this understanding to other spheres in our life? To be able to see that if a friend is unreliable, maybe it's because they don't know what's wrong or because we haven't tried to help them fix their flaw. If an employee is underperforming, just talk to them or figure out if they're lacking in support. ...

"How satisfying it is to dismiss and block out any upsetting or foreign impression, and immediately to have peace in all things." -MARCUS AURELIUS, MEDITATIONS, 5.2 ("어떤 마음을 불편하게 하거나 외부로부터 영향을 주는 인상을 차단하고 무시해버릴 수 있다면, 얼마나 만족스러울까요? 그리고 즉시 모든 것에 평화를 얻을 수 있습니다." - 마르쿠스 아우렐리우스, 《명상록》 5.2)   The Stoics were mercifully spared the information overload endemic to today’s society. They had no social media, no newspapers, no television chatter to rile them up. But even back then, an undisciplined person would have found plenty to be distracted and upset by.   Part of the Stoic mindset then was a sort of a cultivated ignorance. Publilius Syrus's epigram expresses it well: "Always shun that which makes you angry." Meaning: turn your mind away from the things that provoke it. If you find that discussing politics at the dinner table leads to fighting, why do you keep bringing it up? If your sibling's life choices bother you, why don't you stop picking at them and making them your concern? The same goes for so many other sources ...

"We are like many pellets of incense falling on the same altar. Some collapse sooner, others later, but it makes no difference." -MARCUS AURELIUS, MEDITATIONS, 4.15 (“우리는 한 제단 위에 떨어지는 여러 향의 알갱이와 같습니다. 어떤 것은 먼저 무너지고, 어떤 것은 나중에 무너지지만, 그 차이는 없습니다.”– 마르쿠스 아우렐리우스, 명상록 4.15) What's the difference between you and the richest person in the world? One has a little more money than the other. What's the difference between you and the oldest person in the world? One has been around a little longer than the other. Same goes for the tallest, smartest, fastest, and on down the line. Measuring ourselves against other people makes acceptance difficult, because we want what they have, or we want how things could have gone, not what we happen to have. But that makes no ...